Congress Tried To Pass Right To Repair. Automakers Got It Rewritten

From Transport Evolved.

Lawmakers introduced a bipartisan right-to-repair bill to make it easier to fix your own car. By the time it passed committee, the automakers had rewritten it.

After years of attempts by right-to-repair advocates — and as the efficacy of the 1975 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act faded in the world of connected cars — that bill set out to make it easier for independent garages and owners to work on vehicles, and harder for automakers to mandate franchised-dealer repairs.

But between being introduced with bipartisan support in both chambers and passing committee, it was irrevocably changed into something with less clout, fewer rights, and more protection for the very industry consumers needed protecting from. Today, we delve into those pieces of legislation, ask what changed — and who’s ultimately to blame.

✍️ Editorial note — on "the Kia Boys" and the @MarkRober video:

In the security section I reference "the Kia Boys" and link Mark Rober’s "I Outsmarted Pro Car Thieves." To be precise, these are two separate vulnerabilities. The Kia Boys phenomenon exploited a hardware gap: Kia and Hyundai vehicles built for the US market between roughly 2011 and 2021 that lacked an engine immobilizer, making them startable with a stripped USB connector — a flaw so widespread it drove a measurable spike in thefts and a wave of insurance refusals. Rober’s video demonstrates a more sophisticated attack: a relay/amplification exploit against keyless entry and push-button start, which affects a far broader range of modern vehicles.

I’ve grouped them because they illustrate the same throughline: automakers have repeatedly shipped vehicles with avoidable security weaknesses, then leaned on "for your safety, we can’t open this up" as an argument against right to repair. The history doesn’t support that framing — and open scrutiny tends to find these flaws faster than locked-down secrecy does.

—-

⏱️ Chapter Breakdown:

00:00 – Introduction
05:17 – Another video that touches on politics! Yay!
06:30 – A quick reminder of where we are
07:38 – The Magnuson-Moss Act is showing its age
10:19 – What was in the original bill, HR 1566
12:56 – Help us remain independent!
14:11 – An end to the closed walled garden
15:07 – This didn’t work out the way folks wanted
16:58 – The massive gaps in the rewritten bill
18:20 – To be fair: the bill does some good things
19:39 – A tasty sandwich hiding a poison pill
22:03 – It’s all about "cybersecurity"
23:25 – The insurance argument
24:58 – So it’s all off the table?
25:21 – Donald Trump makes some wild claims
27:04 – Does Jim Farley make it worse?
30:26 – The engineers are on our side
31:51 – Security through obscurity
33:22 – The risks aren’t new — this is a smokescreen
35:52 – Thanks, and goodbye!